Error
Error Code: 389

SAP S/4HANA Error 389: Invalid Role Name

📦 SAP S/4HANA
📋

Description

This error, ERR_SQL_INV_ROLE, indicates that an SQL operation within SAP S/4HANA failed because a referenced database role name is not recognized as valid. It typically occurs when a user or an application tries to assign, revoke, or reference a role that either does not exist or is incorrectly specified.
💬

Error Message

ERR_SQL_INV_ROLE
🔍

Known Causes

4 known causes
⚠️
Role Does Not Exist
The specified role name has not been created or registered within the underlying database of your SAP S/4HANA system.
⚠️
Typographical Error
A spelling mistake or incorrect character was entered when referencing the role name in the SQL statement or configuration.
⚠️
Case Sensitivity Mismatch
The role name was entered with incorrect casing (e.g., 'ADMIN' instead of 'Admin'), and the database or system is configured for case-sensitive role lookups.
⚠️
Incorrect Database Schema
The role name is valid but is being referenced from a database schema or context where it is not defined or accessible.
🛠️

Solutions

3 solutions available

1. Verify and Correct Role Name in ABAP Code medium

Ensures the role name used in ABAP programs matches existing security roles.

1
Identify the ABAP program or transaction that is triggering error 389. This often occurs during custom development or when calling standard SAP functions that interact with security roles.
2
Examine the ABAP code for any statements that reference security roles, such as `AUTHORITY-CHECK` or functions related to role management. Pay close attention to the literal strings or variables used to specify the role name.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TCODE' ID 'TCD' FIELD 'SE16'.
" Check if the role name is hardcoded or dynamically assigned
3
Access transaction `PFCG` (Role Maintenance) in your S/4HANA system to verify the existence and exact spelling of the role that is expected to be used. Ensure there are no typos, extra spaces, or case sensitivity issues.
4
Correct the role name in the ABAP code to precisely match the existing role in `PFCG`. If the role is dynamically assigned, ensure the logic generating the role name is producing a valid and existing role.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TCODE' ID 'TCD' FIELD 'SE16' ROLE 'Z_MY_VALID_ROLE'.
5
Activate the modified ABAP program and re-test the scenario to confirm the error is resolved.

2. Check Role Assignment in User Master Data easy

Confirms that the user executing the transaction has the intended role assigned.

1
Identify the user experiencing error 389. This can be done by checking system logs or asking the user to provide their username.
2
Access transaction `SU01` (User Maintenance) in your S/4HANA system.
3
Enter the user's username and navigate to the 'Roles' tab.
4
Verify that the role expected by the application or transaction is listed and assigned to the user. Ensure there are no typos in the role name as displayed in `SU01`.
5
If the role is missing or incorrectly named, add the correct role or correct the existing assignment. Save the changes.
6
Ask the user to log out and log back in to ensure the new role assignment is active for their session, and then re-test the problematic transaction.

3. Analyze and Recreate Corrupted Role Definition advanced

Addresses potential corruption in the role definition by recreating it.

1
Identify the specific role that is causing the `ERR_SQL_INV_ROLE` error. This might require tracing the error back to its source, potentially through ST05 (Performance Trace) or SM21 (System Log) if not immediately obvious.
2
Access transaction `PFCG` (Role Maintenance).
3
Enter the name of the problematic role and attempt to display it. If `PFCG` shows errors or behaves unexpectedly, it might indicate a corrupted definition.
4
As a workaround, create a new role with a similar name (e.g., appending `_NEW` to the original name). Copy all the authorizations and profiles from the original, potentially problematic role into this new role.
5
Thoroughly test the new role by assigning it to a test user and verifying that all expected authorizations are present and functional. Also, confirm that the error 389 is no longer occurring when using this new role.
6
Once the new role is validated, consider deactivating and then deleting the original, corrupted role (ensure no users are actively using it or that you have a plan to reassign them). Then, rename the new role to the original name if desired, or update all user assignments to the new role.
🔗

Related Errors

5 related errors